Punjab
in turmoil after Supreme Court strikes down SYL state law
10th
November 2016 06:03 PM
CHANDIGARH: Punjab was thrown into
turmoil on Thursday with the Supreme Court striking down a 2004 law passed by
the then state government terminating the Sutlej-Yamuna Link [SYL] canal water
sharing agreement with neighbouring states.
Both the Congress and the ruling
Shiromani Akali Dal reacted strontly against the verdict, and vowed not to
release “a single drop of water“ to Haryana. Punjab Congress president Capt
Amarinder Singh resigned his Lok Sabha seat [Amritsar], and the party’s MLAs
also put in their papers.
Chief minister Parkash Singh Badal of
the Shiromani Akali Dal [SAD] called an emergency meeting of his cabinet, which
passed a resolution against any sharing of water. A special session of the
state Assembly has been called on November 16.
The law held unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court was passed by the Punjab government, then headed by Capt.
Amarinder Singh, in 2004. Called the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act, it
sought to nullify a Supreme Court ruling and proceeded to stop construction of
the remaining part of the SYL canal, which would affect Haryana, Himachal
Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jammu & Kashmir, Delhi and Chandigarh.
However, a five-judge Constitutional
bench of the apex court ruled that Punjab cannot take any such
"unilateral" decision.
The verdict was a response to a
presidential reference from the Centre containing five queries. The bench,
which included justices A R Dave, P C Ghose, Shiva Kirti Singh, A K Goel and
Amitava Roy, unanimously held that its answer to all five questions was
negative.
"All the questions have been
answered in the negative," a five-judge bench headed by Justice A R Dave
said, pronouncing the court’s decision on a presidential reference.
Chief minister Parkash Singh Badal made
it clear that the state government is set on another collision course with the
apex court. “In a nutshell, all I can say is Punjab ka paani nahin jaayega,
nahin jaayega, nahin jaayega . Punjab does not have a single drop of water to
spare,” he said after the emergency cabinet meeting.
He said the Cabinet would call on the
President and request him not to accept the advice of the Supreme Court.
Deputy chief minister and SAD chief Sukhbir Singh Badal said, ``The SYL
canal will not be built at any cost. Not a single brick will be laid.’’
Capt. Amarinder Singh described the
Supreme Court judgment as a “major blow to the people of Punjab,” and blamed
the Akali Dal for failing to present Punjab’s stance in court. Claiming that
his government of 2004 tried to protect Punjab’s interests by enacting the
Punjab Termination of Agreements Act, Amarinder said the Akalis failed to
defend the law in the court. On the contrary, a preposterous idea was floated
by chief minister Badal to seek royalty from the other states that use the
Sutlej water. This was aimed at helping out Haryana, he said. “After helping
out Haryana, it seems Badal is now trying to help Himachal Pradesh too, by
suggesting that it should demand royalty from Punjab,” said Amarinder.
Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal
Khattar hailed the Supreme Court verdict and said the Supreme Court has
given its decision on a vital issue after 12 years and brought smiles to the
faces of every Haryanvi because the state would now get its legitimate share of
the surplus Ravi-Beas waters, some 3.5 million acre feet (MAF).
*****
No comments:
Post a Comment