COMPANIES BILL 2011- HIGHLIGHTS
By
Dr T Padma., LLM., Ph D (Law)
kethepadma@gmail.com
BACKGROUND
In India, the Companies Act, 1956, is the most important piece of
legislation that empowers the Central Government to regulate the formation,
financing, functioning and winding up of companies. The Act contains the
mechanism regarding organizational, financial, and managerial and all the relevant
aspects of a company. It provides for the powers and responsibilities of the
directors and managers, rising of capital, holding of company meetings,
maintenance and audit of company accounts, powers of inspection, etc. The
Companies Act, 1956 has been the founding pillar on which our corporate legal
framework builds upon. It is a formidable, comprehensive document requiring a
great deal of patience, time and perseverance to understand the intricacies of
the subject. The Act came into force on 1st April, 1956. Thereafter,
the Companies Act, 1956 has undergone several changes by amendments.
The Companies Act is administered by the Central
Government through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Offices of
Registrar of Companies, Official Liquidators, Public Trustee, Company Law
Board, Director of Inspection, etc. The Registrar of Companies (ROC) controls
the task of incorporation of new companies and the administration of running
companies.
COMPANIES BILL, 2011
Ø The
Bill has 470 clauses and 7 schedules as against 658 Sections and 15 schedules
in the existing Companies Act, 1956.
Ø The
entire bill has been divided into 29 chapters.
Ø Following
chapters have been introduced, viz.
-
Registered
Valuers (ch.17);
-
Government
companies (ch. 23);
-
Companies
to furnish information or statistics (ch. 25);
-
Nidhis
(ch. 26);
-
National
Company Law Tribunal & Appellate Tribunal (ch. 27);
-
Special
Courts (ch. 28)
Ø The
Bill empowers Central Government to make rules, etc. through delegated
legislation after having detailed consultative process (clause 470 and
others).
Ø The
Bill provides for self-regulatory process and stringent compliance regime.
|
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs took up a
comprehensive revision of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) in 2004 keeping in
view that not only had the number of companies in India expanded from about
30,000 in 1956 to nearly 7 lakhs, Indian companies were also mobilizing
resources at a scale unimaginable even a decade ago, continuously entering into
and bringing new activities into the fold of the Indian economy. In doing so,
they were emerging internationally as efficient providers of a wide range of
goods and services while increasing employment opportunities at home. At the
same time, the increasing number of options and avenues for international
business, trade and capital flows had imposed a requirement not only for
harnessing entrepreneurial and economic resources efficiently but also to be
competitive in attracting investment for growth. These developments
necessitated modernization of the regulatory structure for the corporate sector
in a comprehensive manner.
Earlier, a Bill called Companies (Amendment)
Bill, 2003 had been introduced by Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) (then
Department of Company Affairs) in the Rajya Sabha on 7.5.2003. Later on, a
large number of changes were found to be necessary in the Bill. A decision was,
therefore, taken to carry out a comprehensive review of the Companies Act, 1956
and to introduce a new Companies Bill for the consideration of the Parliament.
The review and redrafting of the Companies Act,
1956 was taken up by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on the basis of a
detailed consultative process. A ‘Concept Paper on new Company Law’ was placed
on the website of the Ministry on 4th August, 2004. The inputs received were
put to a detailed examination in the Ministry. The Government also constituted
an Expert Committee on Company Law under the Chairmanship of Dr. J.J. Irani on
2nd December 2004 to advice on new Companies Bill. The Committee submitted its
report to the Government on 31st May 2005. After considering the report of the
Committee and other inputs received from time-to-time, the Government took up
the exercise of comprehensive review of the Companies Act, 1956.
A Companies Bill 2008 was introduced by the
Government in the Lok Sabha on October 23, 2008. Due to dissolution of the 14th
Lok Sabha, the Companies Bill, 2008 lapsed.
The Government decided to re-introduce the
Companies Bill, 2008 as the Companies Bill, 2009, without any change except for
the Bill year and the Republic year. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs had
introduced the Companies Bill, 2009 in the Lok Sabha on August 3, 2009. The
2009 Bill was referred to Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance which
gave its report on 31st August, 2010.
In view of numerous amendments to the Companies
Bill 2009 arising out of the recommendations of the Parliamentary Standing
Committee on Finance and suggestions of the stakeholders, the Central
Government withdrew the Companies Bill 2009 and introduced a fresh bill – The
Companies Bill 2011.
The Companies Bill 2011 was presented on 14th December 2011
in the Winter Session to replace the existing Companies Act of 1956. It was
immediately withdrawn following differences between the Congress and the
opposition BJP.
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance is likely to
meet to sort out the differences on the Bill.
HIGHLIGHTS
The Companies Bill 2011 contains 29 Chapters, 7
Schedules, 470 clauses as against the Companies Bill, 2009 which consists of
426 clauses under 28 chapters and the Companies Act, 1956 which consists of 658
sections under 13 Parts and 15 schedules. The highlights are shown in the
following table:
S.No.
|
Description
|
Clause Ref. in Companies Bill, 2011
|
1.
|
E-governance in all
company processes
|
120
|
2.
|
Protection to minority
shareholders
|
|
3.
|
Inclusion of at least
one woman director on board
|
149
|
4.
|
Specific framework for
Merger and Acquisitions of companies. Single forum for approval of mergers
and acquisitions
|
233
|
5
|
Cross Border Mergers
|
234
|
6.
|
Squeeze Out Provisions
|
236
|
7.
|
Concept of One Person
Company introduced.
|
3
|
8.
|
Key managerial personnel (KMP) to include Managing Director (MD)
or Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Company
Secretary (CS).
|
|
9.
|
Punishment for personation for acquisition etc. of securities
|
38
|
10
|
Class Action Suits
|
37 & 245
|
11.
|
Registered Valuers
|
247
|
12.
|
Limit on maximum
number of members of private company increased to 200 from 50
|
2(68)
|
13.
|
National Advisory
Committee on Accounting Standards (NACAS) to be renamed as National Financial
Reporting Authority (NFRA) and changes in responsibilities and powers
|
132
|
14.
|
Mandatory Rotation of
auditors
|
139
|
15.
|
Mandatory Compliance
with Auditing Standards
|
143
|
16.
|
Limited Liability
Partnership eligible to be appointed as Auditor of Company
|
141
|
17.
|
Corporate Social Responsibility
– 2% of average net profits of the previous three years
|
135
|
18.
|
Mandatory Internal
Audit for prescribed classes of companies
|
138
|
19.
|
Secretarial Standards
Introduced and provided statutory recognition
|
118 (10) & 205
|
20.
|
Secretarial Audit
|
204
|
21.
|
1/3rd of the total number of directors as independent
directors – listed public companies
|
|
22.
|
Entrenchment Provisions in Articles of Association
|
5
|
23.
|
Statutory Status to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office
(SFIO)
|
211
|
24.
|
Mediation and Conciliation Panel
|
442
|
IMPORTANT PROVISIONS IN
BRIEF
The Companies Bill, 2011, inter alia, provides
for—
1)
E-Governance
Maintenance and allowing inspection of
documents by companies in electronic form are being allowed for the first time.
2)
Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility is being introduced
3) Enhanced Accountability on
the part of Companies
a)
In addition to the concept
of Independent Directors (IDs) introduced, the provisions in respect of their
tenure and liability, etc., have been provided. Code for IDs provided in a new
Schedule to the Bill. Databank for IDs proposed to be maintained by a
body/institute notified by the Central Government to facilitate appointment of
IDs.
b)
Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) Committee of the Board proposed in addition to other
Committees of the Board viz Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration
and Stakeholders Relationship Committee. These committees shall have
IDs/non-executive directors to bring more independence in Board functioning and
for protection of interests of minority shareholders.
c)
Definition of ‘‘promoter’’
also included along with his liability in certain cases.
d)
Provisions in respect of
vigil mechanism (whistle blowing) proposed to enable a company to evolve a
process to encourage ethical corporate behaviour, while rewarding employees for
their integrity and for providing valuable information to the management on
deviant practices.
e)
The Central Government has
been empowered to prescribe restrictions in respect of layers of subsidiaries
for any class or classes of companies.
f)
New provisions suggested for
allowing re-opening of accounts in certain cases with due safeguards.
4) Additional
Disclosure Norms
a)
New disclosures like
development and implementation of risk management policy, Corporate Social
Responsibility Policy, manner of formal evaluation of performance of Board of
directors and individual directors included in the Board report in addition to
disclosures proposed in such report in the Companies Bill, 2009.
b)
Consolidation of accounts: Accounts
of Foreign subsidiaries to be attached for filing them with the Registrar.
Subsidiary to include ‘associate’ and
‘joint venture’ for the purpose of
consolidation.
c)
Every listed company
required to file a return with the Registrar regarding change in the
shareholding position of promoters and top ten shareholders of such company.
5) Facilitating rising of capital by
companies
a)
Provisions for offer or
invitation for subscription of securities on private placement basis revised to
ensure more transparency and accountability.
b)
Companies being allowed to
issue equity shares with differential voting rights.
c)
Central Government empowered
to prescribe, through rules, the requirements in connection with provision for
money made by a company for allowing purchase of company’s shares by its
employees under a scheme for their benefit. Disclosure to be made in the
Board’s report in respect of voting rights not exercised directly by the
employees in respect of shares to which the scheme relates.
6) Audit Accountability
a)
Rotation of auditors and
audit firms being provided for.
b)
Stricter and more
accountable role for auditor being retained. Provisions relating to prohibiting
auditor from performing non-audit services revised to ensure independence and
accountability of auditor. Subject to the maximum prescribed number of
companies, the members of a company may resolve that the auditor or audit firm
of such company shall not become auditor in companies beyond the number as may
be specified in such resolution.
c)
National Advisory Committee
on Accounting and Auditing Standards (NACAAS) proposed to be renamed as
National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) with a mandate to ensure
monitoring and compliance of accounting and auditing standards and to oversee
quality of service of professionals associated with compliance.
d)
The Authority shall consider
the International Financial Reporting Standards and other internationally
accepted accounting and auditing policies and standards while making
recommendations on such matters to the Central Government which will improve
the competitiveness of our companies with other companies. The Authority is
also proposed to be empowered with quasi judicial powers to ensure independent
oversight over professionals.
e)
Cost Audit: Cost records to be
mandated for companies engaged in production of such goods or rendering of such
services as may be prescribed. The concept of ‘‘cost auditing standards’’ being
mandated.
f)
Secretariat Audit: Prescribed
class of companies would need to attach with the Board’s Report, a Secretarial
Audit Report given by a company secretary in practice.
7) Managerial Remuneration
a)
Provisions relating to
limits on remuneration provided in the existing Act (11% of net profits)
included.
b)
For companies with no
profits or inadequate profits remuneration shall be payable in accordance with
new Schedule of Remuneration annexed to the Bill and in case a company is not
able to comply with such Schedule, approval of Central Government would be
necessary. Individual limits for remuneration enhanced in the Bill vis-à-vis
the existing limits. Concept of payment of periodic fees which shall
include sitting fees to directors being included in the Bill.
c)
Independent Directors (IDs)
not to get stock option: IDs not to get stock option but may get payment of
fees and profit linked commission subject to limits specified in the
Bill/rules. Central Government may prescribe amount of fees under the rules.
8) Facilitating
Mergers/ Acquisitions
Simplified procedure (through confirmation by
the Central Government), laid down for compromise or arrangement including for
merger or amalgamation of holding companies and wholly owned subsidiary(ies),
between two or more small companies and for such other class or classes of
companies as may be prescribed. This would result into faster decisions on
approvals for mergers and amalgamations resulting effective restructuring in
companies and growth in the economy. For other companies, such matters would be
approved by Tribunal.
9) Protection
for Minority Shareholders
a)
Exit option to shareholders
in case of dissent to change in object for which public issue was made.
b)
Specific disclosure
regarding effect of merger on creditors, key managerial personnel, promoters
and non-promoter shareholders is being provided. The Tribunal is being
empowered to provide for exit offer to dissenting shareholders in case of
compromise or arrangement.
c)
The Board may have a
director representing small shareholders who may be elected in such manner as
may be prescribed by rules.
10) Investor Protection
a)
Acceptance of deposits from
public subject to a more stringent regime. Central Government to have power to
prescribe class or classes of companies which shall not be permitted to allow
use of proxies. The Bill also to have provisions to provide that a person shall
have proxies for such number of members /such shares as may be prescribed.
b)
Provisions for Class Action
Suits revised to provide minimum number of persons who may apply for such
suits. Safeguards against misuse of these provisions also being included.
11) Serious
Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)
Statutory status to SFIO proposed. Investigation
report of SFIO filed with the Court for framing of charges shall be treated as
a report filed by a Police Officer. SFIO shall have power to arrest in respect
of certain offences of the Bill which attract the punishment for fraud. Those
offences shall be cognizable and the person accused of any such offence shall
be released on bail subject to certain conditions provided in the relevant
clause of the Bill. Definition of ‘Fraud’ provided. Stringent penalty
provided for fraud related offences.
12) Woman Director
At least one woman director is being made
mandatory in the prescribed class or classes of companies.
13) National Company Law Tribunal
(Tribunal)
Keeping in view the Supreme Court’s judgment, on
the 11th May, 2010 on the composition and constitution of the Tribunal,
modifications relating to qualification and experience, etc., of the members of
the Tribunal have been made. Appeals from Tribunal shall lie to National
Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
14) Mediation and Conciliation Panel
It is proposed to create and maintain as ‘Mediation and Conciliation Panel’ for
facilitating mediation and conciliation between parties during any proceeding
under the proposed Legislation before the Central Government or Tribunal.
15) Central Government to have power to exempt/modify provisions of the Act for a class or classes of
companies in public interest. Relevant notification shall be required to be
laid in draft form in Parliament for a period of thirty days.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Published
in Supreme Court Journal / Weekly January, 2012]
An effective corporate congressperson seems to be the need of the hour to minimise industrial disputes.The Bill may include it in one of its provisions relating to transparency in corporate governance.
ReplyDeleteI mean 'ombudsperson' , and not 'congressperson'. The mistake is regretted.
ReplyDeleteMr Gopal S Prasad,
ReplyDeleteThe biggest confounding factor in the political environment of business in India is criminalization of politics. People with criminal backgrounds becoming politicians and elected representatives. Around 28% of the members of the current Lok Sabha have criminal cases pending against them. The charges in several of these cases are of heinous crimes such as rape, murder, robbery, kidnapping, and not just violation of Section 144, or something similar. How can you say that an effective corporate congressperson seems to be the need of the hour?
-KPC Rao
Hi,Every stockholder should have issued a corporate stock certificate with company formation in Qatar in the name of the corporation, issuing the appropriate number of shares of stock to the appropriate owner.Thanks.....
ReplyDelete